The Church of Love: A Blessed Beatles Event

by:

Illustration by Tanith ConnollyWarning: Contains Spoilers from the Beatles Love show by Cirque du Soleil

Against the Beatle naysayers of the world, there is a well-documented list of ‘firsts’ that can be used to win the argument on technical points—first live, international satellite broadcast (“All You Need Is Love”, 1967), first use of feedback in a studio recording (John Lennon’s vibrating A string tacked onto the intro of “I Feel Fine”, 1964), first rock band to employ stadiums for live shows (started at Shea Stadium, 1965, ended at Candlestick Park, 1966), first rock musicians to mix amphetamines and strippers (the influence of amped, bored, Reeperbahn strippers on the Fab Four is often overlooked). That’s just a partial list, mind you, but it nicely illustrates the significance of the band to anyone who needs a reminder.

However, everyone I know that loves the Beatles does so not for their technical or cultural milestones. They love them for their music, which naturally includes their spirit, which naturally comes from their story. Loss and tragedy followed by success so huge it becomes a sort of tragic burden in itself—that is the band’s story. Pain, triumph, defeat, and victory for everyone who followed—in some ways, it is the archetypical martyred king legend. Much time and music has since passed, yet still the Beatles’ victory survives as a memory, and thrives as an influence, which takes us back to a winnable argument against those who feel the Beatles were pop stars and nothing more—a sentiment that reminds me of the Python quote: “What have the Romans ever done for us?”

A collective love for the Beatles’ music, spirit, and story (these words can be used interchangeably) is the lynchpin for the huge success of Cirque du Soleil’s Beatles Love show, playing for infinity (I hope) at the Mirage in Las Vegas. For Beatles fans, the show is a deeply spiritual experience. For fans of rock music, it is merely arresting. It is a very heady thing, and the music is the star (thank god) beneath which Cirque’s brilliant and colorful performers interpret the Beatles’ history and the evolution and demise of ’60s cultural movements. Put another way, Love is a live, Technicolor, surround-sound, historical documentary that swings. Because of this, much of the show’s visual symbolisms mean one thing to fans who know well the Beatles’ history and the ’60s, and mean something else only slightly less poignant to those who only know the band by there infinite loop of hits.

And if you’re anticipating four guys who can sing who happen to kinda-sorta look like the Fab Four, you will be either relieved or disappointed, depending on whether you approve of such pastiche. In Cirque’s temple of Love, such a thing would be considered sacrilege. George Harrison and Cirque founder Guy Laliberté had begun collaborating on this show before George passed. His wife Olivia, with the help of son Dhani, kept the flame lit, Paul and Ringo blessed the event, as did Yoko Ono, though perhaps not unconditionally.

This was not to be one of those county fair shows where four guys take the stage in moptop wigs and end the night in fake hippie beards. This is a show where the real Paul McCartney doubles the verse on “Come Together” from right over your shoulder. So clear, so intimate, yet perfectly mixed with the music literally filling the space around you that you can’t help but turn and survey the source of Paul’s vocal.

The show opens with a superb remix and remaster of the Beatles’ impeccable a cappella harmony piece “Because” while a chimneypot skyline—part Liverpool, part Saville Row rooftop concert—rises at the audience’s feet. The stunning sound quality of the vocals renders the audience pliable for transformation. This is followed by a mash-up of several key Beatles song moments, as if their life in music was rushing by. The mash-up parks on the groovy “Get Back”, mixed with bits from other songs, while the cast fills the stage with beautifully choreographed pandemonium. The music morphs into “Glass Onion”, at which point the cast of Love tears the skyline down. It seems to be pure Summer of Love mayhem with a cast of characters I sort of recognize—Father Mackenzie, Eleanor Rigby, the Nowhere Man, flower children, and blossoming youths, including John Lennon as a child. As the skyline is being destroyed, I realize that the mayhem is maybe not so innocent and carefree. The song ends, the lights change, and I quickly realize that the stoic, working-class England represented in that chimneypot landscape has been reduced to post-WWII London Blitz rubble. We are all back in the ashes that delivered us this band.

And that’s just the first few minutes.

It is at this point that I realize many tears will fall on this night. Not just from being moved by the art of Love in sight and sound, and not just from the melancholia of post-WWII Britain. Tears will fall because I know how this story ends.

Cirque seems to be aware of the fire they are playing with, and therefore carefully balance tragedy with triumph, similar to how the Beatles’ music inherently balanced Paul’s sweetness with John’s rebellion. As artistic director Kati Renaud states, “When one performs at Love, there is a strong feeling that they are not performing at ‘just another Cirque show.’ There is a part of you that is involved in the wonderful world of the Beatles, not just Cirque.”

The embodiment of Paul’s sweetness comes when the Sugar Plum Fairy meets a very ripe Lady Madonna during her namesake song. The Sugar Plum Fairy is played by South African street performer Michael Moloi, who has a smile that can cure clinical depression. Michael never heard the Beatles before he auditioned for Love. Asked about this, he says, “I never listened to their music before in my life, but the more I listen to it every day during the show, I feel moved by the lyrics, the beats, and the style. The more I listen to it, I hear new things!” Thank George Martin for that, and perhaps his son Giles, who won Grammys for their graceful remixing and mash-ups of Love’s music.

by:

published: May 12, 2009

in column: Riot Gear!

10 comments

Tags:

10 Comments

  1. Paul
    Posted May 12, 2009 at 2:14 am | Permalink

    Thanks for this review, I know a lot of rock snobs, and or Beatles purists who have not gone to see this show due to some deeply held bias. I held back from judging it until I could see it myself, or rather until I could “experience” it myself. As a deep cut Beatle scholar, and as one who was never drawn run off to the Cirque before, I have to say I am a Love convert. Kudos to Laliberte, The Beatles and the Martin father and son team. Haters beware: Love is stronger than the loudest sneer.

  2. Love Shines!
    Posted May 12, 2009 at 3:51 am | Permalink

    This show…..brought me to tears as did this article. This article reminds me of exactly how I felt in the theatre, not wanting to leave to spil out into the 21st century Las Vegas..”Can you take me back where I came from, brother can you take me back…..”

  3. Jason Scruton
    Posted May 12, 2009 at 5:35 am | Permalink

    I admire the warmth with which the author talks about the show. It raises a good question: what if you just don’t get the Beatles? I can appreciate them for all the technical innovation they brought into the realms of music production…but the songs, regardless of when they came from, leave me cold. Some covers I’ve heard of their material — like McElmore Avenue by Booker T and the MGs — that do a better job of carrying the song’s weight and joy than the fab four had done. Couldn’t it also be argued that The Beatles — I take that back — their management/label were at the forefront of commodifying the performer? BeatleMania might have been a legit youthborn and youthfueled phenom, but propelling that forward has ever bit to do with the way people had taken advantage of it. Is the difference perhaps just proximity to the event itself? (And even though I like the rolling stones’ catalog at gut level, I don’t think that exempts them from the same thing — like the whole
    would you want your daughter to date a rolling stone’ headline of Loog’s construction.

  4. PurpleNeonLights
    Posted May 13, 2009 at 10:50 am | Permalink

    First off, let me say that I am as dyed-in-the-wool of a Beatle fanatic as one can be.

    That said, I understand hat Jason Scruton says about appreciating the Beatles’ technical innovation, but being left cold by the songs.

    I am the same way about classical. I have a profound appreciation for the awesome craftsmanship and skill involved in the composition and performance of classical pieces. But, do I play them on my CD player? No. With a few exceptions here and there, I find classical boring.

  5. Cold Scruton?
    Posted May 13, 2009 at 8:55 am | Permalink

    Hmmmm..’In My Life’ leaves you cold? No beauty in Strawberry Fields? I find that so amazing…baby, I’m amazed…

  6. Cold Purple Lights
    Posted May 14, 2009 at 4:42 am | Permalink

    Nicely put.

  7. Nick
    Posted May 14, 2009 at 4:55 am | Permalink

    Good article but there’s a big blunder- that’s not Paul singing backing up John on “come together”- that’s John himself doing it which was dubbed in.

  8. Paul
    Posted May 15, 2009 at 1:23 am | Permalink

    It’s Paul singing back up on the verse which is what I think the article is describing.

  9. Here Ringo, Have a Banana!
    Posted May 15, 2009 at 2:35 am | Permalink

    Expert anaylsis of Come Together:First verse is completely single tracked by John. The rest of the verses have Paul’s backing vocal entering always in the last part of the first phrase (allowing John to start alone), then dropping out for the last bit, leaving John exposed again. In all but the final verse, that last phrase has John single tracked.
    The refrains all start off with Paul backing John on the first couple beats, then dropping out, leaving John to double track the rest of it in unison. Actually, the second refrain has John single tracked for some reason on those last couple beats.

  10. sT
    Posted May 28, 2009 at 8:22 am | Permalink

    A couple of weeks ago I was going to write a comment and tell you that it’s the best article you’ve ever written. But I couldn’t because I was WAY too jealous of the fact that you got to see the show TWICE and yet I’ve not been able to get there to see/hear/experience it yet. And jelousy, as we know, is forbidden in the Beatles santuary. Only love is allowed.

    Anyway, I loved the story, I love the CD I have of the show, I love the memories I have of “growing up” with The Beatles and I love it that my little girl actually listened to a Beatles song yesterday and didn’t compare them with Hanna Montana or the Jonas Brothers.

    But dammit, I’m still jealous of not having been there yet! Good thing it’s a permanent show, lol.

    sT

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  • advertisement

  • follow us

  • Straight to Video

    The Henry Clay People, "Working Part Time"

    March 20, 2009 at Mohawk Outside Stage in Austin, TX

  • Rock Art Rock

    • Rock Art Rock: Pete Townshend and Keith Moon by Jim Summaria
    • Rock Art Rock: Ann Wilson by Jim Summaria
    • Rock Art Rock: Paul McCartney by Jim Summaria
    • Rock Art Rock: Mick Jagger by Jim Summaria

    See more in the Rock Art Rock gallery.

  • Most Read Articles

  • polls

    Pandora! You use it:

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...