advertisement
follow us
Newsletter signup
Get a little Crawdaddy! right in the inbox once a week:
Straight to Video
Rock Art Rock
Pete Townshend and Keith Moon from the Who
1975
Chicago Stadium, Chicago, IL "Photo from the 'Who by Numbers' tour..."
Ann Wilson from Heart
1978
Chicago Amphitheater, Chicago, IL "Photo from the 'Dog and Butterfly' tour."
Paul McCartney from Wings
1976
Chicago Stadium, Chicago, IL "Photo from the 'Wings Over America' tour."
Mick Jagger
1975
Chicago Stadium, Chicago, IL "The 1975 Tour of the Americas was the Rolling Stones' first with Ronnie Wood."
See more in the Rock Art Rock gallery.
Most Read Articles
- The Smoke-Filled Room, What Goes On: Former Ethiopian General Claims Live Aid Funds Were Spent on Arms
- Lyrical Communique: Lyrical Communique: Kiss, “Strutter”
- Feature Story: Rick Danko: Infectious Joy and Non-Showbiz Charisma
- What Goes On: David Bowie Choses Anonymity for Golden Years
- Reviews, What Goes On: Album Review: Various Artists, Almost Alice
- What Goes On: Details of Radiohead’s New Album a Hoax
- My Life Is the Road: Clarence White and Jim Morrison Stretch on a 747
polls
Loading ...-
Heart of Weirdness: Neil Young, “Revolution Blues”
Something about being splendidly famous didn’t sit right with Neil Young. His star had steadily ascended throughout the later portion of the ’60s, and then went supernova with the release of Harvest in 1972. This unsettling career peak set against the backdrop of an aimless and endless military conflict, a freshly confirmed second term for a conservative warmonger (what year was this again?), and a handful of overdosing cronies sent Young careening into the abyss. The tours and records that immediately followed were a reckless expedition into the jungles of paranoia and despair, navigated with bloodshot eyes. By 1974, the intrepid songwriter probably needed a vacation from all that was heavy, and the aptly titled On the Beach could have been it; but two songs in, like a feverish jetlag nightmare, the demons pulled Neil down into the sinister funk of “Revolution Blues.”
From the opening chords, the tension is palpable, and the first verse lets us know the sort of character we’re dealing with: “Well, we live in a trailer / At the edge of town / You never see us / ‘Cause we don’t come around / We got 25 rifles / Just to keep the population down.” It’s not difficult to imagine the scene, even now, but as the ideals of the counterculture soured, this stanza must have seemed uncomfortably appropriate. Radical principles and isolation rarely make for good neighbors, and firearms tend to complicate things further. The verse continues as some sort of recruitment, but our antagonist needs to work on his pitch: Admitting that he’s “not above suspicion,” he fails to establish much trust, so the reassurance that he won’t attack us in the penultimate line is little consolation.
Whew… well, that was a creepy encounter for sure, but who hasn’t brushed up against madness on the bus or at the bar? Unfortunately, this lunatic is a little harder to shake, and the terror quickly escalates in the second verse: “Well, it’s so good to be here / Asleep on your lawn / Remember your guard dog? / Well, I’m afraid that he’s gone.” This crazy fuck followed us home and killed our dog?! Turns out he’s been hanging around our work, too, performing weirdo stalker-type demonstrations. Jesus Christ, Neil… what happened to “Heart of Gold”?
As the song staggers towards its bloody conclusion, the horror envelops us in a hail of machine gun shells and some sort of siege, the hallucinatory imagery culminating in the song’s most memorable and shocking stanza: “Well, I hear that Laurel Canyon / Is full of famous stars / But I hate them worse than lepers / And I’ll kill them in their cars.”
[Gulp!]
Chilling. The geographic location is perhaps most telling: It kinda feels like Young was re-imagining the Manson Family murders as a revenge fantasy on the rock royalty that popularly inhabited the Canyon in the early ’70s, a community to which his own fame was inextricably linked. These troubadours had become part of the establishment that they had once rallied against because it allowed them to make their music, and clearly that made Young a little anxious.
Whether or not Young intended to take aim at himself and his singer-songwriter contemporaries, “Revolution Blues” is still a compelling reflection of the times. Peace and love were still a recent memory, yet fear was seeping into every aspect of the culture. The revolutionaries had gone mad or militant, the musicians got rich or insane. It would certainly not be the last time Neil Young attacked his subject with such vehemence, but it may be the most terrifying.
Listen: “Revolution Blues” [at youtube.com]


3 Comments
Great dissemination of this song. It’s one of my favorite, and the first time I heard it I was amazed at the dark, tense groove and the grossly paranoid character Neil creates. Such a sharp contrast to his releases leading up to it. And he would go on to release a few more of these dark, crazy albums. The ditch trilogy, man, gotta love it. Hair-whiteningly frightening.
There was no need for Neil to “re-imagine” the Manson murders. As detailed in Young’s massive biography, “Shakey,” Young actually knew Manson from when Charlie used to hang around Topanga (not Laurel) Canyon, prior to becoming a world-famous mass murderer. The book even claims that David Briggs, Young’s producer, was the only one with balls enough to stand up to Manson. So, even if the song is an allegory about wiping out the smug singer-songwriters of Laurel Canyon, it was informed by Young’s own interaction with Manson during the brief period when their paths crossed. “On The Beach” remains one of my favorite Neil records.
Revolution Blues is pure irony. At the time there was a very real danger of the Manson ‘family’ becoming hip – that their wooly, hippie-esque ramblings combined with a general taste for insurrection would turn them into underground heroes. Neil adopted the Manson persona, wrote a good riff, threw in a few cool things like dune buggies and some wry humour, but the message was; “Come on now, this is a joke – do you really and truly think this guy is cool? Or is he just hijacking the real movement?” Well that’s what I took away from it – not a change of direction for Neil but a confirmation of his beliefs.