advertisement
follow us
Newsletter signup
Get a little Crawdaddy! right in the inbox once a week:
Straight to Video
Rock Art Rock
Pete Townshend and Keith Moon from the Who
1975
Chicago Stadium, Chicago, IL "Photo from the 'Who by Numbers' tour..."
Ann Wilson from Heart
1978
Chicago Amphitheater, Chicago, IL "Photo from the 'Dog and Butterfly' tour."
Paul McCartney from Wings
1976
Chicago Stadium, Chicago, IL "Photo from the 'Wings Over America' tour."
Mick Jagger
1975
Chicago Stadium, Chicago, IL "The 1975 Tour of the Americas was the Rolling Stones' first with Ronnie Wood."
See more in the Rock Art Rock gallery.
Most Read Articles
- The Smoke-Filled Room, What Goes On: Former Ethiopian General Claims Live Aid Funds Were Spent on Arms
- Lyrical Communique: Lyrical Communique: Kiss, “Strutter”
- Feature Story: Rick Danko: Infectious Joy and Non-Showbiz Charisma
- What Goes On: David Bowie Choses Anonymity for Golden Years
- Reviews, What Goes On: Album Review: Various Artists, Almost Alice
- What Goes On: Details of Radiohead’s New Album a Hoax
- My Life Is the Road: Clarence White and Jim Morrison Stretch on a 747
polls
Loading ...-
Pages: 1 2
Mr. Soul: Neil Young vs. My Morning Jacket’s Jim James
My Morning Jacket and their frontman Jim James are doing what Neil Young did years ago—melding musical scenes. While Young, armed with Crazy Horse, collided folk with grunge, My Morning Jacket more ambitiously blends an overwhelming array of genres, from reverb-heavy guitar grooves to folk melodies to danceable dub and soul. Go to a concert by either and you will see hippies and hipsters, mothers and daughters, flannel-shirted men and backwards-capped frat boys, all bobbing as one.
What is this unifying force that both singers have been able to tap into? Whatever it is must be big, because they speak very different musical languages.
Young has always been a romantic through and through, from his roots in folk to his emotive and naturalistic lyrics. He sings about the physical world—its people, its beauty, and its weight. His songs feel with bare nerves.
James’ language is a supernatural one. I’m going to cop out and call him a postmodernist, a word that can eat itself before revealing anything about an artist. But despite the word’s pitfalls, it works to capture James’ intentional evasion of definition and his disillusionment with words. James would probably disagree with this tag, as he disagrees with most labels attached to his music (comparisons to Neil Young included). Unfortunately, this would only make him more postmodern.
On the surface, the muse speaks through Young and James with the same voice. People talk about the similarity of their metallic wails, somehow both angelic and rustic. But dissecting their voices reveals the contrasting nature of their artistic methods.
James’ voice sounds like Young’s with the rust filtered out. Free of grit, his pipes can reach unearthly pitches that Young’s never could. On Z, My Morning Jacket’s last studio album, James’ voice becomes more of an instrument than ever before, splintering through the subtle harmonies of tracks like “Gideon” and exploding at the end of the KISS-like stadium rocker “What a Wonderful Man.” James’ voice, like My Morning Jacket’s music, never sits still long enough to get pinned down.
As they post on their website, My Morning Jacket aims to create songs “like clouds.” This idea recalls Phil Spector’s “wall of sound” production technique, which created layers of sonic density. But James ensures, with his dexterous and slippery vocal range, that these walls are permeable and evasive. He doesn’t use any blueprint or formula to construct songs. Like wind pushing a thundercloud, James’ voice melds with, flows through, and collides into reverb-laden basslines and guitars that wrap you up before you know what hit you.
Young’s voice, in contrast, hangs onto folky fibers even at its most metallic registers (“Down by the River” and “Hurricane”) and reverb-thick arrangements (of Freedom and Ragged Glory). It tears at itself from the inside out, unable to unload the weight of heartache and pain. The natural conflict in Young’s voice is also what makes it so genuine.
Young has always relied on an honesty of expression with his lyrics. Although his words often slip into abstractions, he always delivers them clearly. And when he isn’t making political statements, he speaks about experiences and feelings—of love, loss, and aging—that any sentient being can relate to. This isn’t to say that Young can’t write complex and abstract songs. His aching voice has always created tension between a song’s meaning and its mood. This is apparent on both lyrically-abstract albums, like On the Beach and Zuma, and gut-wrenching love songs like “I’ve Loved Her so Long” on his self-titled solo album. One truth Young’s music reveals is that any experience usually holds more than one emotion at once.
My Morning Jacket creates similar tensions of mood in their music, but their songs are more intentionally cryptic. James makes the lyrics hard to hear. He bends and evaporates the meaning of words in a wash of sound. Also, the fragmented nature of his lyrics makes them more ambiguously abstract than Young’s. Much like Radiohead’s Thom Yorke, James swirls together phrases and images that often lack a clear narrative, speaker, and subject. In “Into the Woods”, which sounds like a Neil Young tune that took some hard drugs and hitched a ride on a carousel, James says, “A kitten on fire / A baby in a blender / Both sound as sweet as a night of surrender.”
Pages: 1 2


8 Comments
Most people, even die hard fans of CSNn’t really know all that much about the personal life and musical motivations of Neil Young, save for the usual rock press interviews and hagiograpic press blurbs. It wasn’t until the bio “Shakey” was published a few years back, that much of the “real” story of Neil Young was widely told to a still-adoring audience.
Nice article, and it’s easy to see the connections between these two. Their ethereal voices stop you in your tracks. James is nowhere near the songwriter Young is, but there’s still a lot of road to burn. . .
Thank you for only mentioning reverb twice. Also, I’m sort of curious about the last idea about MMJ borrowing from everyone in the early 90’s grunge era. What did they borrow from bands like Soundgarden?
Wonderful review – both vivid and lyrical in its exploration of the similarities and differences of these musical talents.
Very well written and fascinating comparison.
In the second to last paragraph, do you think that the words to “The Way He Sings” is about a Neil Young song? That would be interesting.
Cy-really well done!
Yes I will agree with the commonality of styles, but the most ashaming thing is Jim James doesn’t want to be linked or remotely attached to Neil Young. He hates that people think that MMJ sounds or styles are similar. Thats a disgrace and personally I am shocked that a compliment like that would be recieved with such disdane from Jim James.