New York Dolls: Old Dolls, New Tricks

by:

Johnny Thunders is gone now. And that is a tragedy to be sure.

But tragedy is a funny thing, and its relationship to great art has been well-documented over the years. So, it comes as no surprise those 30 years worth of tragedy would provide the impetus for the New York Dolls’ stunning—if not wholly unexpected—resurgence.

photo by Dennis ReclaConsider the fact that the Dolls are three decades removed from the Greenwich glam and boy-toy buzz that got them off the ground, that Andy Warhol is dead and he took the ’70s with him, or that Ziggy Stardust grew up and Malcolm McLaren moved on.

Consider the fact that Billy Murcia has long since passed, as have Jerry Nolan and—more recently—Arthur “Killer” Kane. Consider that the record industry has been privatized, scandalized, completely American Idolized, leaving little if any room for retro-rockers in their 20s, let alone their 50s.

Consider how a band that wasn’t commercially viable the first time round finds the chutzpah to reemerge with only two of its founding members left intact. Consider how they avoid falling victim to the pitfalls of a pop-stardom past.

I know. It’s a lot to consider. But how does a band pull off that type of comeback without risking the cult status they’ve already achieved?

Well, if you’re the New York Dolls—or at least what’s left of them—the first thing you don’t do is reach for some lip gloss and a pair of 30-year old thigh highs. The next thing you don’t do is try to replicate the decadence of mid-‘70s glam by writing a collection of pill-popping, acid-dropping rock tunes, despite the fact you’ve been (mostly) clean and sober for more than a decade.

And under no circumstances do you bullshit yourself or anyone else into believing you’re someone or something that you’re not anymore.

Instead, you gather 30 years worth of anger and frustration, triumph and adulation, and you use it to ground your music in a way you never have before—happiness becomes an old blues song, nostalgia becomes a sorrowful joy, and the rock ‘n’ roll landscape becomes a punishing world.

You write about life after the fall and all the blows that came with it. You openly acknowledge the Poindexter pompadour, the fishnets and cigarettes, the lessons learned and lost along the way. And you sprinkle it all with the wink of an eye, as if to say, “We’ve come to a point where we can look back and smile.”

One Day It Will Please Us To Remember Even This (Roadrunner, 2006) is the story of a band whose expectations never met reality and all the implications they had for the members who persevered. It’s also a stark reminder that the best band out there may still find itself with two month’s worth of back rent and a cabinet full of Ramen Noodles.

David Johansen and Sylvain Sylvain, the only surviving members of the original Dolls, existed long before MTV and YouTube put ugly rock stars out of business, and the Dolls themselves are the unfortunate reality for every indie band that claims they would’ve been huge if only they’d come along in the late ‘60s or early ‘70s.photo by David Didier

Sylvain and Johansen seem to have made their peace with the past. Perhaps they even take solace in the idea that if Johnny Thunders hadn’t gone the way of his vices, it’s possible this reunion would’ve never taken place. It’s no secret that Johansen and Thunders were at odds when the New York Dolls drifted apart.

For years there was talk of the Dolls getting back together, but Johansen wasn’t picking up his phone, and Sylvain’s phone wasn’t even ringing. It wasn’t until Morrissey made a call in 2004 and suggested everyone play nice that things began to gel.

But that was before Arthur Kane was diagnosed with Leukemia, before Roadrunner Records and South by Southwest came-a-courtin’, before the old New York Dolls enlisted some new New York Dolls to join them in the studio. And it was long before the Dolls were completely confident they’d be welcomed back with open arms.

This time around the Dolls got it right. And that has a lot to do with the fact that they weren’t spending their nights drinking till dawn in a back booth at Max’s Kansas City, that the band was focused and ready when they went into the studio each day, that there was a renewed sense of optimism replacing the excess and in-fighting of old.

And that might seem like a very un-rock ‘n’ roll way for the New York Dolls to conduct business, but the result is a much tighter sound that somehow still maintains the grit and conviction of the original—even elevates it in some ways. Beneath it all lies the idea that the New York Dolls were (and are) about something more than glitz; that substance was (and still is) at the heart of their music.

All of which makes one wonder what the resurgent Dolls might do for an encore.

It took more than 30 years worth of heartache, loss and neglect for them to reunite and record one stellar album. The question is: do they have another 30 years worth of pain and hardship to spare?

Watch: old NY Dolls “Looking For a Kiss” [at youtube.com]

Watch: new NY Dolls “Gotta Get Away From Tommy” [at youtube.com]

by:

published: July 11, 2007

in column: The Switchback

15 comments

Tags:

15 Comments

  1. anonymous
    Posted July 11, 2007 at 10:12 am | Permalink

    great piece! i feel enlightened about a band that i really didnt know much about, thanks!

  2. kathy
    Posted July 11, 2007 at 10:21 am | Permalink

    I was there for the Dolls at the very begining in the Oscar Wilde room of the Mercer Arts Center, and at the end for Red Patent Leather at the Hippodrome. Welcomed their comeback a few times live. Great article about an important influential band. I still miss Johnny Thunders, though. He was always a really nice guy to me. Despite the junk, he was a mensch.

  3. jove
    Posted July 11, 2007 at 11:47 am | Permalink

    Great piece, Bob! I was a little put off by the Wolfmother piece a few weeks back, but this here wipes the slate cleaner than clean.

    This is also a great column for evaluating reunions! Plenty of fodder there, nowadays.

    Thanks for the solid thoughts.

  4. AJF
    Posted July 11, 2007 at 11:59 am | Permalink

    I just watched a documentary on Arthur “Killer” Kane filmed around the time of the reunion called “New York Doll”. It was sad and brilliant. Any doll fan should check it out.

  5. Uriah Heep
    Posted July 11, 2007 at 12:41 pm | Permalink

    Long live the Dolls.

  6. anonymous
    Posted July 11, 2007 at 2:10 am | Permalink

    My mom shared a house with Arthur in the 70’s. He was a really sweet guy

  7. Billy Claire
    Posted July 11, 2007 at 5:47 am | Permalink

    Stone Pony on July 20th- woo hoo!

  8. Jason Scruton
    Posted July 12, 2007 at 9:08 am | Permalink

    Glad to find Crawdaddy again – it’s hard to keep a good forum down. The question of whether the Dolls have 30 yrs. of pain to spare feels ‘off’; they might not need that much of emotional backlog to launch another single or record into the ears. Mission of Burma is perhaps a cool example of this phenom. They toured after reuiniting out of the blue, recorded OnOffOn (not stellar, but not embarrassing by a long shot), and then recorded the obliterati – a hulking whallop of songs. The other thing the artivle brings to my mind are the expectations of the audience — expecting an encore. Fer me, I miss the day when the final song of the set really felt like “THIS IS IT, I CAN’T TAKE NO MORE.” Then you got hit with the act playing a few more songs and WHAMMO! the ball they knocked out of the park is knocked out of the state – a good surprise.

  9. Laura
    Posted July 12, 2007 at 8:37 am | Permalink

    Good work! Seeing them at the troc with you was pretty good too.

  10. anonymous
    Posted July 16, 2007 at 5:11 am | Permalink

    Saw the Dolls in Long Island on Saturday. They were loud, funny, energetic, a little sloppy, in a word, they rocked. New songs are great and they played all the old shit I could have ever expected. May they live forever in the hearts and minds of music fans everywhere.

  11. Paw
    Posted July 16, 2007 at 8:51 am | Permalink

    Caught the 2007 Dolls in Long Island this weekend. They were loud, funny, wonderful, energetic, a little sloppy but mostly they were fucking great. I mostly try to ignore the comeback bands with fewer than 3 original members (not easy to do these days) but I’m really glad I made the exception this time. The new songs rock hard without being irrelevant and the old shit sounded as fresh as the Mercer Arts Center days. Rock on, Dolls!

  12. Vixx
    Posted September 7, 2007 at 12:06 pm | Permalink

    Some things are just MEANT to be…NYD is one of them. Whatever the circumstance, whoever it happened, they are and always will be iconically &
    musically blessed.

  13. kid
    Posted October 24, 2007 at 5:07 am | Permalink

    if is wasn’t for iggy and lou this group would SUCK…

  14. douge66
    Posted December 6, 2007 at 9:43 am | Permalink

    I caught their show in Buffalo a few months ago and the were awesome. First time that I saw them was when they opened for Mott the Hoople, and an unknown band called Areosmith open for them in ‘73. Damn… was that the best show or what!

  15. dollsuck
    Posted January 20, 2008 at 5:44 am | Permalink

    basically the most overrated band ever, i just don’t get it their songs were all pretty crappy even the covers were lame! they weren’t any good even whn glam was in – in a word craptacular.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  • advertisement

  • follow us

  • Straight to Video

    British Sea Power, "Blackout"

    March 1, 2008 at Bottom of the Hill in San Francisco, CA

  • Rock Art Rock

    • Rock Art Rock: PJ Harvey by Brian Birzer
    • Rock Art Rock: Chhom Nimol from Dengue Fever by Brian Birzer
    • Rock Art Rock: Raymond Pettibon by Brian Birzer
    • Rock Art Rock: Scott Weiland by Brian Birzer

    See more in the Rock Art Rock gallery.

  • Most Read Articles

  • polls

    Which Gallagher brother would you form a band with?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...