advertisement
follow us
Newsletter signup
Get a little Crawdaddy! right in the inbox once a week:
Straight to Video
Rock Art Rock
Blitzen Trapper
June 16, 2010
Webster Hall, New York
by Ben Jay "Having shot mostly indie concerts during the past few months, photographing experimental-folk rockers (imagine Wilco, but with heavier guitar) Blitzen Trapper was quite a treat..."
Silversun Pickups
October 23, 2009
Main Street Armory, Rochester, NY
by Ben Jay "Alt-rockers Silversun Pickups put on an excellent live show that blends perfectly with their noisy, yet ambient sound..."
Portugal. The Man
March 19, 2010
Highline Ballroom, New York
by Ben Jay "If you want to be completely blown away at an indie show in an intimate setting, see Portugal. The Man."
Ian Anderson
October 11, 2009
MGM Grand at Foxwoods, Ledyard, CT
by Ben Jay "While he may not be as dynamic as he was with Jethro Tull in the '70s, Ian Anderson can still put on a fantastic show."
See more in the Rock Art Rock gallery.
Most Read Articles
- Ex Post Facto, What Goes On: Ex Post Facto: Radiohead, In Rainbows
- Feature Story, interview, What Goes On: Jerry Devo’s Belushi Coke Yarn and Other Stories
- Origin of Song: Origin of Song: Bittersweet Tales of “Isn’t It a Pity”
- What Goes On: Jimi Hendrix’s Estate and Martin Scorsese Sued by Sax Player
- The Weakest Cut, What Goes On: The Weakest Cut: Van Halen
- Dueling Critics, Reviews: Dueling Critics: Sun Kil Moon, Admiral Fell Promises
- Feature Story, interview: Where the Go-Go’s Go From Here
polls
Loading ...Concert Finder
-
Pages: 1 2
It’s The Music… Stupid

The mainstream music industry has finally spun off the planet and is now floating in space, operating by logic that is foreign to humans much less consumers. The arguments of just how badly the major record companies have missed the mark in assuaging music fans, while trying to adapt their ancient business models as the times have changed over the last 10 years, are rampant. Each week brings news of how one of the big boys has unveiled some ho hum scheme that’s supposed to bring them into the fold of the times. This is usually followed by news of the RIAA suing another grandmother for supposedly sharing files on a peer-to-peer network.
Apple recently began selling Digital Rights Management (DRM) free tracks on its iTunes store. The tracks come solely from British record giant EMI, one of the so-called “Big Four,” whose empire includes Capitol Records here in the U.S. The tracks are sold in Apple’s AAC format in 256kbps resolution instead of their normal iTunes offerings at half the bit rate. As it turns out, though, Apple is including a user name and email address in the files tag, which can be viewed by anyone who examines the file. And now CD trading site LALA has announced this past week it will begin selling downloads that will work on the iPod that have a “watermark” of their own.
So much for DRM free! Thanks for the trust guys, not to mention the added bonus of worrying about having my privacy violated if I lose my iPod. I mean, damn, I was going to buy a few tracks and immediately share them over the internet, and I would have gotten away with it if it weren’t for you snooping kids!
Apple has long hoped for a deal allowing it to sell DRM free songs. Until now, they have been prohibited from doing so by the agreements they have with the major labels and the RIAA that allow it to sell their music. For Apple, the reason is obvious. They are being sued in countries across Europe for not opening up its DRM technology so as to allow other companies to compete by selling DRM songs that will play on Apple’s ubiquitous iPod. Rather than opening up their technology, Steve Jobs has called upon the labels to abandon DRM. That way, music sold on any site can be played on any device. For Apple that makes all the sense in the world as it would see an increase in the sale of iPods without any real damage to its iTunes sales. EMI, well, they were just taking another blind stab at slowing they’re morbidly declining record sales, albeit with a better blade than any of the other labels have used.
It’s pathetic that this is the most progressive attempt by a major record label to adapt to the digital music revolution 10 years after it began. Music has always been on the cutting edge of popular culture, originating from the youth culture of the ‘50s and ‘60s that crossed borders and languages to unite divergent groups in the love of similar things. Music WAS the driving force before all else. A generation of youth from across the developed world could find that they indeed had something in common despite all their differences, even if it was just a love of the Beatles. Music still fulfills this role in many ways, just not so much with popular music anymore.
While some music like the independent varieties are still on the cutting edge of art and culture, the established mainstream music business has become the most technologically and culturally backward element in popular culture. The “Big Four” and their bullhorn, the RIAA, have dragged their nails in the dirt trying to resist change and, in the process, have pissed of consumers so much that they’re not buying their music anymore.
Pages: 1 2




7 Comments
I think the big labels are really in their last death throes, trying to greedily hang onto their profits, unable to look into an uncertain future. My prediction is that they’ll start focusing more on the Distribution side of things, while sitting on cash cows like Paul McCartney or Toby Keith. They’ll rely on the smaller labels to take all the gambles with new artists and indie bands, waiting for these bands to start garnering a profit… and then they’ll seduce them with big distribution deals. The small labels may be sub-contracted as little PR / marketing companies, focusing much energy on promoting and acquiring new talent, while using cushy big label dollars for the rare investment. Just a thought.
is this the same writer who wrote the internet radio piece? solid voice. you know what you’re talking about.
thats why every single one of my songs (12GB of total music) has been downloaded for free. Although I use an iPod, I’ll be damned if I am going to pay CD prices. At least this way, if my music has personal info on them, it will be the info of someone else.
Perhaps when labels pay the artists what they deserve, release quality CD’s (with more than 2 radio airplay singles with 12 more crap filler tracks) and make the pricing worth my while I will legally get my music.
It’s not that I am pissed at the Big 4…they just don’t put out product worth spending the money on or even worth downloading for free.
A long time ago, theyd ecided that accountants and lawyers needed to run the business, not “record guys” as they dismissively called people like Ahmet Ertegun etc…. SO thats why we have the situation where they don’t put out interesting acts anymore and only see lawsuits as the way to grow the bottom line.
Sorry Jennn, but it has been the record labels focus on distribution that has helped create the current situation. In the early 90’s they bought all the major independent distributors. SO when the digital revolution came, the lables choose to focus on the old model since they were still paying off the debt of having acquired all the distibutors.
“thats why every single one of my songs (12GB of total music) has been downloaded for free”
That’s BS… admit you don’t want to pay even for the good quality stuff, even when they are not part of the RIAA people…
And DUH! you think it would be THIS easy to give us untrackable tracks? come on people! of course they were going to cover their asses with something… otherwise EMI or any of the others when they do, would agree on doing it.
i thought the nickleback thing was funny… since they’re just a crappy sell-out band like all the “big 4″ bands r.